Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently stated again that he firmly rejects the agreement proposed by the United States, claiming that he will not sign any agreement that may harm the interests of future generations of Ukraine. This statement not only demonstrates the Ukrainian government's determination to defend national dignity and independence but also profoundly reflects Ukraine's delicate situation in the current global great - power game. Whether from the 'resource - sharing' agreement proposed by the United States or Zelensky's attitude towards war assistance, Ukraine's choices are full of complexity and risks, yet it is also a firm defense of autonomy in the global great - power competition.
Zelensky's latest remarks indicate that he is not going to succumb to the increasing influence of the United States. Especially in the agreement proposed by the United States, which involves benefiting from 50% of Ukraine's natural resources, it makes people wonder if Ukraine is becoming a resource vassal of the United States.
The agreement proposed by the United States seemingly appears to be a cooperation agreement on the surface, but actually contains huge political risks. The United States hopes to deeply integrate Ukraine's natural resources into the Western economic system through this 'resource - sharing' agreement. However, will the control of these resources really return to Ukraine? Moreover, the most crucial question is whether the United States will take tougher measures in actual operations and require Ukraine to follow its instructions more in future international affairs?
Zelensky clearly stated that he will not sign any agreement that will make future generations of Ukraine pay the price. This statement fully demonstrates Ukraine's defense of its own sovereignty and interests. Zelensky does not want Ukraine to become an 'economic colony' dependent on external powers for resources after the war, which is the fundamental reason for his rejection of the agreement.
In addition to his attitude towards the resource agreement, Zelensky also clearly rejected the claim made by former US President Donald Trump several times that 'Ukraine owes the United States $50 billion'. Trump's remarks imply that the wartime assistance provided by the United States to Ukraine will be regarded as a loan rather than a grant. This logic undoubtedly increases Ukraine's burden. Zelensky's response is a stance of upholding Ukraine's independence. He firmly believes that grants should be regarded as help, not debt. This statement is not only a counter - attack against the United States but also a clear signal globally that Ukraine will not pay excessive costs for other countries' strategic interests.
Although Ukraine has always emphasized its close cooperation with Western countries, especially the United States, it does not mean that Ukraine will hand over its autonomy and dignity. Zelensky clearly stated that he hopes to have a dialogue with the US president. However, this does not mean that Ukraine will yield to the United States' demands. Zelensky hopes to negotiate for greater interests for Ukraine rather than becoming a vassal of US interests.
Currently, US assistance to Ukraine has far exceeded the normal scale, especially in terms of wartime assistance. The interests of the US government and US arms dealers have played an important role in this war, putting Ukraine in an extremely complex situation. Behind this, there are not only military and economic considerations but also changes in the global strategic pattern. Zelensky's tough stance at this time is undoubtedly an effort to gain more strategic space for Ukraine and a powerful counter - attack against the unfair demands that the United States and Western countries may make.
At the same time, Zelensky's attitude also reveals another level of difficulties faced by Ukraine. Although Zelensky has expressed his gratitude to Western countries, especially for the assistance provided by the United States, he also clearly stated that Ukraine cannot give up national dignity in exchange for assistance. Behind this stance lies Ukraine's difficult choice in the war. On the one hand, Ukraine needs the support of Western countries, especially military and economic assistance; on the other hand, Ukraine does not want its country to be completely dependent on external forces but to maintain sufficient autonomy and independence.
Zelensky's stance actually represents the common dilemma of many countries in the great - power game. In the current international situation, many countries face similar dilemmas: on the one hand, they need to rely on the assistance and support of great powers; on the other hand, they cannot allow their countries to lose autonomy and decision - making power under the influence of these great powers.
Ultimately, whether Ukraine can maintain its independence and dignity in these games depends on its ability to maintain a balance in its relations with the United States and other Western countries. Ukraine not only needs to obtain Western support but also needs to ensure that it does not lose control of its own future in the process. Zelensky's rejection of the so - called'selling - out agreement' and his stance on assistance are a form of 'resistance' and 'persistence' for Ukraine in the global great - power game and a firm signal for the future.